Saturday, February 12, 2011

STANDARDIZED TESTING/ASSESSMENT

As a resident of Georgia, I decided to specifically research the way Georgia children are assessed and measured in relations to their academic ability. Students in grades 1-8 must take the Criterion-Referenced Competency Test (CRCT).  The CRCT is designed to measure how well students acquire the skills and knowledge described in the Georgia Performance Standards (GPS). The assessments yield information on academic achievement at the student, class, school, system, and state levels. This information is used to diagnose individual student strengths and weaknesses as related to the instruction of the GPS, and to gauge the quality of education throughout Georgia (2). Beginning in 2004, the state phased in the use of these tests in promotion/retention decisions in grades three, five, and eight. Students in grades three, five, eight, and eleven are required to take a writing assessment each year. All kindergarteners are assessed for first-grade readiness with the Georgia Kindergarten Assessment Program. This is a performance-based test which is administered to each child individually by the child's teacher three times per year. Local school districts are also required to administer a nationally norm-referenced test annually in grades three, five, and eight. The CRCT consist of assessments in reading, english/language arts, and mathematics. Assessments in science and social studies are assessed in grades three through eighth.  Additionally, assessments in reading, English/language arts, and mathematics are administered in grades one, two, three, five, and seventh.
Personally, I’m not a promoter of standardized testing for several reasons. One reason is that the test puts a lot of stress and pressure on a child to perform. If a child has done well and shown the ability to master the goals of his or her grade then that should be enough evidence to promote this child to the next grade. However, I do understand that the Department of Education needs to have some way of measuring the knowledge of children, but I think that is all standardized testing should be used for.  Also in Georgia there is so much pressure for the students to pass this test that many teachers just teach the CRCT all year.  I think that Georgia should change the ruling that children must pass this test in order to be promoted to the next grade. I think the child’s performance in the classroom should be the determining factor.
The Japanese elementary curriculum is cumulative and demanding. At each grade level, children are required to learn large quantities of new material and proceed quickly from one new concept to the next. Although most children manage to keep reasonable pace with the instructional objectives, some fall behind. These children are termed ochikobore, which is those who have "fallen to the bottom" of the system (1). Although detailed evidence is scarce, the problem clearly exists and receives considerable sympathetic attention in the mass media and from the public. Some evidence regarding the extent of the problem is found in a recent comparative study of reading achievement among first and fifth grade children in one city in Japan. Results for the Japanese sample showed that although most children enter first grade well prepared in reading, but by fifth grade a significant number of them have fallen seriously behind (1). However, this type of assessing ends and standardized testing begins at the age of 12 year of age.  
I found it very interesting that Japan doesn’t implement standardized testing until the child reaches the age of 12 years old.

2.    http://www.doe.k12.ga.us/ci_testing.aspx



2 comments:

  1. Betty,
    Most schools not only in the USA but elsewhere used assessment only to meet their curriculum standards. I experienced this in my native island as well. I hope countries especially the smaller islands in the caribbean could revisit their educational system and take drastic measures for the reformation of assessing children.
    Thank you for your post!

    ReplyDelete
  2. The pressure on Japanese children to succeed academically seems intense. The standards of learning as well as the curriculum, who creates those? In your research did you come across any information regarding the emotional and social pressure on these children? I can only speculate, but would imagine these children are hampered in their emotional growth. The term "whole child" would not come into play in Japan.

    ReplyDelete